The Court Cases Targeting Mifepristone/Medication Abortion

⚡TL; DR (too long, didn’t read)

Anti-abortion extremists are attacking access to medication abortion any way they can—including by pushing baseless court cases to ban or severely restrict mifepristone, a medication used in the majority of abortion care in the U.S.

Mifepristone has been used safely for more than 20 years and is backed by overwhelming scientific evidence. The nonstop attacks on mifepristone are not about protecting patients—they are about creating confusion, chaos, and real consequences for people who need or want care.

Help combat disinformation: Share our social media toolkit with your family and friends and spread the truth that mifepristone is safe and effective.

🔎A Closer Look: The Supreme Court Left Mifepristone Vulnerable to Attack

The Supreme Court left attacks on mifepristone open in its ruling on Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA, a baseless case cooked up by anti-abortion extremist group AHM, a right-wing org that was whipped together specifically to ban medication abortion.

In its ruling in June 2024, the Supreme Court did not affirm the science or safety of mifepristone. Instead, SCOTUS dismissed the case saying that AHM could not show that anyone in that organization was personally harmed (a legal technicality called standing), essentially giving extremists the blueprint to try again.

This ruling left the door open for new lawsuits against mifepristone—which is exactly what Republican attorneys general and anti-abortion groups are now pursuing in lower courts in Missouri, Florida, and Louisiana.

These renewed cases aim to:

• Ban mifepristone nationwide by revoking its FDA approval
• Ban telehealth access to mifepristone
• Reinstate outdated and medically unnecessary restrictions on mifepristone

🤿 Dive Into the Details: Federal Lawsuits Brought by Anti-Abortion Groups

• Louisiana v. FDA is one of three federal cases brought by anti-abortion state officials seeking to block telehealth access to mifepristone.
• Florida v. FDA seeks to further block mifepristone entirely by undoing its decades-old FDA approval.
• Missouri v. FDA stems from the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA case heard by the Supreme Court that also seeks to block telehealth access and reinstate medically unnecessary restrictions on mifepristone.

🕸️ Meanwhile, Mifepristone is Under Coordinated Attack by Anti-Abortion Extremists

Beyond these court cases, and despite two decades of scientific evidence for mifepristone’s safety and effectiveness, Republican lawmakers and anti-abortion groups have coordinated an all-out attack against mifepristone:

⚠️ The Stakes: What it Means to Restrict Mifepristone

Abortion bans cause devastating harm. Banning or rolling back access to the most commonly used method of abortion can lead to a de facto nationwide ban—even in places where abortion is legally protected.

🛩️The Big Picture: Their Goal is a Backdoor Abortion Ban

Anti-abortion extremists will not be satisfied until abortion is banned nationwide, providers and patients are punished, birth control is restricted, and fetuses and embryos are granted full legal rights as people.

This effort has nothing to do with safety, or science. These lawsuits are part of a broader, coordinated effort to ban abortion nationwide, as outlined in Project 2025. By weaponizing the courts, anti-abortion extremists are attempting to override medical science, democratic will, and decades of safe use.

 📢 Take Action: Spread the Word

Americans overwhelmingly support abortion access. Instead of listening to voters or medical experts, extremists are relying on a court system packed with judges who are putting ideology over justice and fairness to override science, medicine, and the will of the people.

That’s why it is important for us to stay informed, and take action now.